<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92127</link>
    <description>Notification No. 225/86-C.E., as amended, allows exemption from duty on paper and paper board to the extent of excise duty paid on specified inputs used in or in relation to manufacture. The benefit operates as an abatement against duty on the final products, so a strict one-to-one correlation between particular input lots and corresponding finished goods is not required at every stage of clearance. The inputs must nevertheless have been actually used in or in relation to manufacture of the notified goods, and the exemption is limited to duty paid on such inputs. The one-to-one objection was rejected and the matter was remanded for verification of actual use and grant of the notification benefit if satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:19:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92127</link>
      <description>Notification No. 225/86-C.E., as amended, allows exemption from duty on paper and paper board to the extent of excise duty paid on specified inputs used in or in relation to manufacture. The benefit operates as an abatement against duty on the final products, so a strict one-to-one correlation between particular input lots and corresponding finished goods is not required at every stage of clearance. The inputs must nevertheless have been actually used in or in relation to manufacture of the notified goods, and the exemption is limited to duty paid on such inputs. The one-to-one objection was rejected and the matter was remanded for verification of actual use and grant of the notification benefit if satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>