<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92123</link>
    <description>In stay proceedings before CEGAT, pre-deposit of penalty may be waived where the record shows a prima facie case and recovery can be stayed pending appeal. The Tribunal granted full waiver and stay in the case of M/s. Essex Marketing (P) Ltd., and also waived pre-deposit with stay in the Customs matter of M/s. Tosha International Ltd. In the Central Excise matter concerning the same company, the Tribunal found complete waiver unwarranted but directed only a partial deposit of penalty, while staying recovery of the balance pending appeal. The note reflects that financial hardship and case facts may justify limited pre-deposit instead of full deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:06:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92123</link>
      <description>In stay proceedings before CEGAT, pre-deposit of penalty may be waived where the record shows a prima facie case and recovery can be stayed pending appeal. The Tribunal granted full waiver and stay in the case of M/s. Essex Marketing (P) Ltd., and also waived pre-deposit with stay in the Customs matter of M/s. Tosha International Ltd. In the Central Excise matter concerning the same company, the Tribunal found complete waiver unwarranted but directed only a partial deposit of penalty, while staying recovery of the balance pending appeal. The note reflects that financial hardship and case facts may justify limited pre-deposit instead of full deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>