<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92113</link>
    <description>Additional consideration flowing back to the assessee must be included in the wholesale price before the assessable value is worked back after admissible deductions; it cannot be added to an assessable value already determined without factoring in that amount. The text notes that this approach had been accepted in the assessee&#039;s earlier case and upheld by the Supreme Court. On that basis, the issue was resolved in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:22:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92113</link>
      <description>Additional consideration flowing back to the assessee must be included in the wholesale price before the assessable value is worked back after admissible deductions; it cannot be added to an assessable value already determined without factoring in that amount. The text notes that this approach had been accepted in the assessee&#039;s earlier case and upheld by the Supreme Court. On that basis, the issue was resolved in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>