<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 256 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92108</link>
    <description>The judgment favored the appellants, allowing deductions for freight from Depot to Depot, quantity discount, discount for damages, and charges for clearing based on established legal precedents and lack of sufficient grounds presented by the Revenue to challenge these deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:52:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 256 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92108</link>
      <description>The judgment favored the appellants, allowing deductions for freight from Depot to Depot, quantity discount, discount for damages, and charges for clearing based on established legal precedents and lack of sufficient grounds presented by the Revenue to challenge these deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>