<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 255 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal adjourned the hearing to await the orders of the South Regional Bench, allowing both parties to present their arguments. No stay of operation was granted due to the absence of a revival application. The Tribunal advised the Commissioner to await its decisions before finalizing assessments, considering the legal complexities involved. Efficient proceedings and cautious handling of legal controversies were emphasized throughout the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 255 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal adjourned the hearing to await the orders of the South Regional Bench, allowing both parties to present their arguments. No stay of operation was granted due to the absence of a revival application. The Tribunal advised the Commissioner to await its decisions before finalizing assessments, considering the legal complexities involved. Efficient proceedings and cautious handling of legal controversies were emphasized throughout the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>