<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92102</link>
    <description>Limitation for reversal of wrongly availed Modvat credit under Rule 57-I runs from the date the credit is taken; where show cause notices are issued more than six months later, the demand is time-barred. Recovery also cannot be sustained on a provisional assessment basis unless the assessment has been finalised and the liability has crystallised; a notice that does not proceed on finalisation cannot support demand on that footing. The impugned orders were set aside, and the assessees obtained consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:07:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92102</link>
      <description>Limitation for reversal of wrongly availed Modvat credit under Rule 57-I runs from the date the credit is taken; where show cause notices are issued more than six months later, the demand is time-barred. Recovery also cannot be sustained on a provisional assessment basis unless the assessment has been finalised and the liability has crystallised; a notice that does not proceed on finalisation cannot support demand on that footing. The impugned orders were set aside, and the assessees obtained consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>