<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92099</link>
    <description>Appeals concerning eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 208/83-C.E. were dismissed for non-prosecution when the appellants failed to appear despite service of notice. The tribunal noted that the exemption question depended on appreciation of factual material and could not be decided on the available record in the appellants&#039; absence. As a result, the merits of the exemption claim were left unadjudicated and the appeals were not entertained further.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:53:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92099</link>
      <description>Appeals concerning eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 208/83-C.E. were dismissed for non-prosecution when the appellants failed to appear despite service of notice. The tribunal noted that the exemption question depended on appreciation of factual material and could not be decided on the available record in the appellants&#039; absence. As a result, the merits of the exemption claim were left unadjudicated and the appeals were not entertained further.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>