https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92071 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner's decision due to unjust invocation of a longer limitation period, lack of willful suppression, and failure to consider previous approvals and technical literature. The judgment highlighted the importance of establishing intent to evade duty and the necessity for fair and justified decision-making in classification disputes under the Central Excise Act, 1944. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:59:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92071 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner's decision due to unjust invocation of a longer limitation period, lack of willful suppression, and failure to consider previous approvals and technical literature. The judgment highlighted the importance of establishing intent to evade duty and the necessity for fair and justified decision-making in classification disputes under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92071