<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 393 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92044</link>
    <description>A duty demand based on alleged suppressed production cannot be sustained where the production shortfall is computed only from consumption of one raw material and not from a properly fixed production norm under Rule 173E. The governing rule requires assessment of relevant manufacturing factors, including wastage, start-up and shutdown losses, labour and power variations, and other operating conditions. A formula used by the manufacturer was not shown to create an inflexible obligation to produce a fixed quantity, and the evidence did not establish that the entire shortfall represented suppressed production. On that incomplete basis, both the duty demand and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:11:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 393 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92044</link>
      <description>A duty demand based on alleged suppressed production cannot be sustained where the production shortfall is computed only from consumption of one raw material and not from a properly fixed production norm under Rule 173E. The governing rule requires assessment of relevant manufacturing factors, including wastage, start-up and shutdown losses, labour and power variations, and other operating conditions. A formula used by the manufacturer was not shown to create an inflexible obligation to produce a fixed quantity, and the evidence did not establish that the entire shortfall represented suppressed production. On that incomplete basis, both the duty demand and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>