<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 347 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside penalties imposed on BPT officers and the owner and agent of ship MV &quot;Kota Naga&quot;. It emphasized the importance of establishing personal knowledge and conscious involvement in smuggling for penalties under Section 112. The Tribunal required clear and independent evidence to justify confiscation and penalties, noting the lack of evidence linking the agent to smuggling and questioning the validity of the panchnama.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:44:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 347 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside penalties imposed on BPT officers and the owner and agent of ship MV &quot;Kota Naga&quot;. It emphasized the importance of establishing personal knowledge and conscious involvement in smuggling for penalties under Section 112. The Tribunal required clear and independent evidence to justify confiscation and penalties, noting the lack of evidence linking the agent to smuggling and questioning the validity of the panchnama.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>