https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92025 In an appeal concerning classification of soft ferrite goods, the Tribunal held that the dispute between Heading 8548.00 and Heading 8505.00 was at least arguable, so complete dispensation of pre-deposit was not warranted. It directed a partial pre-deposit as a condition for admission of the appeal, dispensed with pre-deposit of the balance duty for hearing, and stayed recovery of the remaining amount subject to compliance with the deposit direction. The Tribunal also fixed a date to verify compliance. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:55:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92025 In an appeal concerning classification of soft ferrite goods, the Tribunal held that the dispute between Heading 8548.00 and Heading 8505.00 was at least arguable, so complete dispensation of pre-deposit was not warranted. It directed a partial pre-deposit as a condition for admission of the appeal, dispensed with pre-deposit of the balance duty for hearing, and stayed recovery of the remaining amount subject to compliance with the deposit direction. The Tribunal also fixed a date to verify compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92025