https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92013 The Court concluded that the Supreme Court judgment in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India applies to all Tribunals, including CEGAT, as the power of judicial review under Articles 226/227 is a basic feature of the Constitution. The High Court has jurisdiction to review CEGAT's orders if the cause of action arises within its territorial limits, regardless of the Tribunal's headquarters location. The availability of an alternative remedy under Section 35L of the Excise Act does not bar the maintainability of the writ petitions. The Court overruled the respondents' objections and directed further proceedings before an appropriate Bench. en-us Wed, 28 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92013 The Court concluded that the Supreme Court judgment in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India applies to all Tribunals, including CEGAT, as the power of judicial review under Articles 226/227 is a basic feature of the Constitution. The High Court has jurisdiction to review CEGAT's orders if the cause of action arises within its territorial limits, regardless of the Tribunal's headquarters location. The availability of an alternative remedy under Section 35L of the Excise Act does not bar the maintainability of the writ petitions. The Court overruled the respondents' objections and directed further proceedings before an appropriate Bench. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92013