https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91980 At the stage of framing charge under the NDPS Act, co-accused statements and the material on record were insufficient to disclose prima facie abetment or criminal conspiracy against the petitioner. The record did not show his presence when the other accused were apprehended with the narcotic-laden car, and the statements only suggested that he may have been contacted or expected to receive the goods, without any overt act linking him to the seizure. On that basis, the charge could not be sustained and was quashed, and the petitioner was discharged. en-us Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:45:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91980 At the stage of framing charge under the NDPS Act, co-accused statements and the material on record were insufficient to disclose prima facie abetment or criminal conspiracy against the petitioner. The record did not show his presence when the other accused were apprehended with the narcotic-laden car, and the statements only suggested that he may have been contacted or expected to receive the goods, without any overt act linking him to the seizure. On that basis, the charge could not be sustained and was quashed, and the petitioner was discharged. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91980