<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91969</link>
    <description>Unconditional stay of recovery of the confirmed duty and penalty was granted because the appeal involved the same issues and similar demands as a related pending matter. The tribunal followed a coordinate order in that connected case, which had already allowed complete stay on the same footing, and applied the same interim treatment here to maintain consistency in recovery proceedings pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:22:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91969</link>
      <description>Unconditional stay of recovery of the confirmed duty and penalty was granted because the appeal involved the same issues and similar demands as a related pending matter. The tribunal followed a coordinate order in that connected case, which had already allowed complete stay on the same footing, and applied the same interim treatment here to maintain consistency in recovery proceedings pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>