<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91959</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit as a condition for entertaining the appeal was declined where the appellant faced a duty demand based on alleged suppression in respect of free-supplied bushes, but similarly situated job-workers had already obtained favourable appellate orders that the Revenue did not challenge. Applying consistent treatment among identical assessees, the Tribunal held there was no basis to single out the appellant for a deposit requirement. Recovery under the impugned order was therefore stayed pending final disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91959</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit as a condition for entertaining the appeal was declined where the appellant faced a duty demand based on alleged suppression in respect of free-supplied bushes, but similarly situated job-workers had already obtained favourable appellate orders that the Revenue did not challenge. Applying consistent treatment among identical assessees, the Tribunal held there was no basis to single out the appellant for a deposit requirement. Recovery under the impugned order was therefore stayed pending final disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>