<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91953</link>
    <description>Waste cotton yarn generated at the weaving stage was held outside Notification No. 95/61-C.E. because excise duty on cotton yarn attached when manufacture was completed at the spindle stage. Rule 49A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 merely deferred collection until clearance of the fabrics and did not change the point at which liability crystallised. As the exemption had to be applied according to its terms, post-spindle wastage in a composite mill did not gain a fresh exemption, and the demand was sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:43:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91953</link>
      <description>Waste cotton yarn generated at the weaving stage was held outside Notification No. 95/61-C.E. because excise duty on cotton yarn attached when manufacture was completed at the spindle stage. Rule 49A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 merely deferred collection until clearance of the fabrics and did not change the point at which liability crystallised. As the exemption had to be applied according to its terms, post-spindle wastage in a composite mill did not gain a fresh exemption, and the demand was sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>