<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 149 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91947</link>
    <description>Cotton swabs were analysed for tariff classification by reference to their manufacture, character and intended use. Because they were made from cotton slivers and answered the description of articles of wadding of textile materials, they fell under Chapter Heading 56.01. They did not qualify as brooms or brushes under Chapter Heading 96.03 merely because they were used for cleaning dirt and wax from ears and allied applications. The stated conclusion was that classification under Chapter Heading 56.01 was correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 149 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91947</link>
      <description>Cotton swabs were analysed for tariff classification by reference to their manufacture, character and intended use. Because they were made from cotton slivers and answered the description of articles of wadding of textile materials, they fell under Chapter Heading 56.01. They did not qualify as brooms or brushes under Chapter Heading 96.03 merely because they were used for cleaning dirt and wax from ears and allied applications. The stated conclusion was that classification under Chapter Heading 56.01 was correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>