<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 167 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91916</link>
    <description>Declared value of second-hand imported machinery cannot be rejected merely because another machine of the same make and year was imported at a higher CIF price. For valuation to be enhanced on a comparable-import basis, the department must show that the relied-upon machine was truly comparable in condition, extent of use, residual life and state at the time of importation. A Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate may support the value of a new machine of the same kind, but it does not by itself justify rejection of the declared value of used machinery. Depreciation guidance for second-hand machinery was treated as a proper basis for valuation, and the allegation of undervaluation was not established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:05:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 167 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91916</link>
      <description>Declared value of second-hand imported machinery cannot be rejected merely because another machine of the same make and year was imported at a higher CIF price. For valuation to be enhanced on a comparable-import basis, the department must show that the relied-upon machine was truly comparable in condition, extent of use, residual life and state at the time of importation. A Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate may support the value of a new machine of the same kind, but it does not by itself justify rejection of the declared value of used machinery. Depreciation guidance for second-hand machinery was treated as a proper basis for valuation, and the allegation of undervaluation was not established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>