<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 163 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91912</link>
    <description>Copper sulphate classification was treated as having a prima facie basis under Heading 3808.00 as a pesticide, because an earlier Tribunal decision had already considered and accepted that classification after comparing it with Heading 2833.00. In the absence of any distinguishing feature from that earlier ruling, the Tribunal applied it to the present dispute for interim relief purposes. Duty deposit was waived and recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:54:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 163 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91912</link>
      <description>Copper sulphate classification was treated as having a prima facie basis under Heading 3808.00 as a pesticide, because an earlier Tribunal decision had already considered and accepted that classification after comparing it with Heading 2833.00. In the absence of any distinguishing feature from that earlier ruling, the Tribunal applied it to the present dispute for interim relief purposes. Duty deposit was waived and recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>