<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 157 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91907</link>
    <description>Ignition switches manufactured by the assessee were classifiable under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff and not under Tariff Item 61, because the classification issue was already covered by an earlier Tribunal decision on identical goods. The Tribunal found no contrary reason to depart from that binding precedent and upheld the lower authority&#039;s classification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:43:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 157 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91907</link>
      <description>Ignition switches manufactured by the assessee were classifiable under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff and not under Tariff Item 61, because the classification issue was already covered by an earlier Tribunal decision on identical goods. The Tribunal found no contrary reason to depart from that binding precedent and upheld the lower authority&#039;s classification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>