<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 134 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91885</link>
    <description>An assessee opting for the compounded levy scheme was discussed as not being barred, for the relevant period, from seeking redetermination of duty liability where the governing precedent permits it. The note states that the controversy on duty reassessment under the Central Excise framework was resolved by following earlier Tribunal decisions, and that the refusal to redetermine duty merely because the scheme had been opted for was not sustained. It records that the impugned order was set aside and redetermination in accordance with the statutory provision was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:40:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 134 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91885</link>
      <description>An assessee opting for the compounded levy scheme was discussed as not being barred, for the relevant period, from seeking redetermination of duty liability where the governing precedent permits it. The note states that the controversy on duty reassessment under the Central Excise framework was resolved by following earlier Tribunal decisions, and that the refusal to redetermine duty merely because the scheme had been opted for was not sustained. It records that the impugned order was set aside and redetermination in accordance with the statutory provision was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>