<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91879</link>
    <description>Penalty under the Central Excise Rules was not sustainable where the assessee&#039;s Modvat credit claim had already been accepted as legally admissible. Once the appellate authority upheld the credit, the foundation for treating the claim as wrongful disappeared, and no rule violation remained to attract penal action. On that basis, penalty under Rule 173Q could not be levied, and the assessee succeeded on the penalty issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:28:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91879</link>
      <description>Penalty under the Central Excise Rules was not sustainable where the assessee&#039;s Modvat credit claim had already been accepted as legally admissible. Once the appellate authority upheld the credit, the foundation for treating the claim as wrongful disappeared, and no rule violation remained to attract penal action. On that basis, penalty under Rule 173Q could not be levied, and the assessee succeeded on the penalty issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>