<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 157 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91870</link>
    <description>Refund of duty on captively consumed intermediate goods is subject to the bar of unjust enrichment where the duty forms part of the cost of the final product sold in the market. If it cannot be shown with certainty that the incidence of duty was borne by the claimant and not passed on to buyers, clause (e) of the proviso to Section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act applies. The principle in Solar Pesticides governs this situation, and refund is not admissible on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:49:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 157 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91870</link>
      <description>Refund of duty on captively consumed intermediate goods is subject to the bar of unjust enrichment where the duty forms part of the cost of the final product sold in the market. If it cannot be shown with certainty that the incidence of duty was borne by the claimant and not passed on to buyers, clause (e) of the proviso to Section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act applies. The principle in Solar Pesticides governs this situation, and refund is not admissible on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>