https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91863 The appeal before the Tribunal was dismissed as time-barred due to the delay in filing. The appellant sought condonation of delay citing closure of units and staff transfer. The appellant's argument for diligent prosecution was countered by the respondent's claim of choosing wrong forums and lack of staff as insufficient reasons for delay. Orders and amendments affecting the appeal process were considered. The delay was attributed to the Advocate's busy schedule, leading to the appeal's dismissal. The proper forum for appeal was clarified, and the lack of specific direction from higher courts led to rejection of the condonation application. en-us Mon, 21 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:35:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91863 The appeal before the Tribunal was dismissed as time-barred due to the delay in filing. The appellant sought condonation of delay citing closure of units and staff transfer. The appellant's argument for diligent prosecution was countered by the respondent's claim of choosing wrong forums and lack of staff as insufficient reasons for delay. Orders and amendments affecting the appeal process were considered. The delay was attributed to the Advocate's busy schedule, leading to the appeal's dismissal. The proper forum for appeal was clarified, and the lack of specific direction from higher courts led to rejection of the condonation application. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91863