<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 147 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91860</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that clearances under Notification 46/81 should not be considered when calculating clearances under Notification 178/85 for the financial year 1985-86. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed, subject to the provisions of unjust enrichment under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:30:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 147 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91860</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that clearances under Notification 46/81 should not be considered when calculating clearances under Notification 178/85 for the financial year 1985-86. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed, subject to the provisions of unjust enrichment under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>