<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 142 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91855</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications must be applied according to their plain cumulative conditions: where Notification No. 103/76 required both a worker-limit and a power-consumption limit, failure to satisfy the power condition defeated the exemption, and a later amendment to Notification No. 88/77 could not rewrite the earlier text. For Notification No. 88/77, eligibility depended on the actual number of workers during the preceding 12 months, and the claimant had to prove compliance from primary records. A return filed with the Directorate of Industries was not a sufficient basis where the assessee&#039;s own registers were not produced, so the exemption issue required fresh adjudication on the correct factual record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 142 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91855</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications must be applied according to their plain cumulative conditions: where Notification No. 103/76 required both a worker-limit and a power-consumption limit, failure to satisfy the power condition defeated the exemption, and a later amendment to Notification No. 88/77 could not rewrite the earlier text. For Notification No. 88/77, eligibility depended on the actual number of workers during the preceding 12 months, and the claimant had to prove compliance from primary records. A return filed with the Directorate of Industries was not a sufficient basis where the assessee&#039;s own registers were not produced, so the exemption issue required fresh adjudication on the correct factual record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>