https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91852 Questions framed for reference to the High Court were rejected because they merely sought a reappraisal of the Tribunal's evidentiary findings. The order under challenge rested on appreciation of the record, including the view that the material was insufficient to establish clandestine removal. As no independent question of law emerged from the proposed questions, the reference application was not maintainable and was rejected. en-us Fri, 11 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:06:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91852 Questions framed for reference to the High Court were rejected because they merely sought a reappraisal of the Tribunal's evidentiary findings. The order under challenge rested on appreciation of the record, including the view that the material was insufficient to establish clandestine removal. As no independent question of law emerged from the proposed questions, the reference application was not maintainable and was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91852