<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91849</link>
    <description>Unaccounted stock, private production records and officers&#039; statements were treated as sufficient evidence of clandestine manufacture and clearance, and the admitted clandestine production and removal of one variety of yarn further supported the revenue case. On that basis, the duty demands and consequential confiscation and penalty were held sustainable, and the challenge to the impugned order failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:58:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91849</link>
      <description>Unaccounted stock, private production records and officers&#039; statements were treated as sufficient evidence of clandestine manufacture and clearance, and the admitted clandestine production and removal of one variety of yarn further supported the revenue case. On that basis, the duty demands and consequential confiscation and penalty were held sustainable, and the challenge to the impugned order failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>