<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 125 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91838</link>
    <description>Unauthorised import of firearms without the requisite import licence or customs clearance permit attracted confiscation and personal penalty where the named consignees were the individual importers and lacked the necessary documents. Confiscation was therefore sustained, but redemption on payment of fine was allowed in line with parity for similar consignments, and the penalties on those consignees were upheld. Penalty could not be imposed on a third person merely because his name appeared in other house air way bills; absent evidence that the named consignees were fictitious or that he had abetted the imports, his penalty for those consignments was set aside. Liability for unauthorised import must be supported by proof of importer or abettor status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:24:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 125 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91838</link>
      <description>Unauthorised import of firearms without the requisite import licence or customs clearance permit attracted confiscation and personal penalty where the named consignees were the individual importers and lacked the necessary documents. Confiscation was therefore sustained, but redemption on payment of fine was allowed in line with parity for similar consignments, and the penalties on those consignees were upheld. Penalty could not be imposed on a third person merely because his name appeared in other house air way bills; absent evidence that the named consignees were fictitious or that he had abetted the imports, his penalty for those consignments was set aside. Liability for unauthorised import must be supported by proof of importer or abettor status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>