<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 244 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91831</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Collector of Central Excise against M/s. Maganlal Nandlal &amp;amp; Sons was dismissed on the grounds of maintainability. The Central Board of Excise and Customs sought to club the clearances of three firms located at the same premises and managed by the same family members. However, as the appeal was only against one party and not all three firms, the court deemed it not maintainable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:56:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 244 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91831</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Collector of Central Excise against M/s. Maganlal Nandlal &amp;amp; Sons was dismissed on the grounds of maintainability. The Central Board of Excise and Customs sought to club the clearances of three firms located at the same premises and managed by the same family members. However, as the appeal was only against one party and not all three firms, the court deemed it not maintainable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>