<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 228 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91816</link>
    <description>A conditional waiver of pre-deposit can be granted where the applicant shows a prima facie case and financial hardship, but the Tribunal may still require a partial deposit if the record does not adequately support the defence on the core allegation. On the valuation-related components, including raw material cost, sales tax, octroi, handling charges, drawing and designing charges, and profit element, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for relief in several respects. However, it was not satisfied with the documents supporting the plea that excise duty was to be reimbursed in relation to the disputed allegation, so it ordered a balance pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the remaining duty and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 228 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91816</link>
      <description>A conditional waiver of pre-deposit can be granted where the applicant shows a prima facie case and financial hardship, but the Tribunal may still require a partial deposit if the record does not adequately support the defence on the core allegation. On the valuation-related components, including raw material cost, sales tax, octroi, handling charges, drawing and designing charges, and profit element, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for relief in several respects. However, it was not satisfied with the documents supporting the plea that excise duty was to be reimbursed in relation to the disputed allegation, so it ordered a balance pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the remaining duty and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>