https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91815 Clandestine removal of processed fabrics without payment of duty was the central allegation, supported by vehicle interception and statements from employees and the driver admitting the modus operandi. The claim that part of the duty had already been paid was rejected because no supporting details were furnished. On that basis, a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs towards duty was directed within two months, and on compliance the balance duty and penalty were waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the case. en-us Tue, 18 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:46:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91815 Clandestine removal of processed fabrics without payment of duty was the central allegation, supported by vehicle interception and statements from employees and the driver admitting the modus operandi. The claim that part of the duty had already been paid was rejected because no supporting details were furnished. On that basis, a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs towards duty was directed within two months, and on compliance the balance duty and penalty were waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91815