<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 241 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91760</link>
    <description>Excise duty could not be sustained where the department failed to establish that sulphuric acid had actually come into existence as a manufactured product from the treatment of maize kernel with water and sulphur dioxide. The Tribunal found that the alleged output was only a dilute, unstable solution and not sulphuric acid as commercially and scientifically understood. Since the demand and the orders below proceeded specifically on sulphuric acid, the absence of proof of manufacture was fatal; marketability therefore did not arise for consideration. The demand was set aside and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 241 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91760</link>
      <description>Excise duty could not be sustained where the department failed to establish that sulphuric acid had actually come into existence as a manufactured product from the treatment of maize kernel with water and sulphur dioxide. The Tribunal found that the alleged output was only a dilute, unstable solution and not sulphuric acid as commercially and scientifically understood. Since the demand and the orders below proceeded specifically on sulphuric acid, the absence of proof of manufacture was fatal; marketability therefore did not arise for consideration. The demand was set aside and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>