https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91739 The appellants, manufacturers of counting and measuring instruments, faced denial of Notification 175/86 benefit for using foreign companies' expressions on goods. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the references to collaboration did not constitute brand name usage, entitling them to the Notification benefit. The Tribunal upheld the Collector's decision on goods not being fully manufactured but set aside penalties imposed without specific reasons. Ultimately, one appeal was partially allowed, and two were fully granted, providing consequential relief to the appellants in a mixed outcome. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:47:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91739 The appellants, manufacturers of counting and measuring instruments, faced denial of Notification 175/86 benefit for using foreign companies' expressions on goods. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the references to collaboration did not constitute brand name usage, entitling them to the Notification benefit. The Tribunal upheld the Collector's decision on goods not being fully manufactured but set aside penalties imposed without specific reasons. Ultimately, one appeal was partially allowed, and two were fully granted, providing consequential relief to the appellants in a mixed outcome. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91739