<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91737</link>
    <description>Printing paste made by simple mixing of duty-paid formulated, standardised or prepared dyes with other materials was stated, on the Board&#039;s Section 37B clarification, not to amount to manufacture and not to fall under the department&#039;s proposed tariff heading; the matter was remanded for fresh factual verification of the inputs and the preparation process before a classification decision. On Modvat credit, the Tribunal stated that if duty was ultimately held payable, credit should not be denied merely for absence of the procedural declaration, provided duty-paid inputs were established by acceptable documents to the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:35:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91737</link>
      <description>Printing paste made by simple mixing of duty-paid formulated, standardised or prepared dyes with other materials was stated, on the Board&#039;s Section 37B clarification, not to amount to manufacture and not to fall under the department&#039;s proposed tariff heading; the matter was remanded for fresh factual verification of the inputs and the preparation process before a classification decision. On Modvat credit, the Tribunal stated that if duty was ultimately held payable, credit should not be denied merely for absence of the procedural declaration, provided duty-paid inputs were established by acceptable documents to the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>