https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91733 Printing ink used to print the buyer's name and brand particulars on polythene bags was treated as an eligible input, because earlier Tribunal decisions had already distinguished the Revenue's cited precedents and accepted printing ink in similar circumstances. The same view had also been applied on identical facts to ink used for printing brand and manufacturer names on bags. In the absence of any contrary authority from the Revenue, that earlier reasoning was followed and the input claim was accepted. en-us Thu, 04 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:10:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91733 Printing ink used to print the buyer's name and brand particulars on polythene bags was treated as an eligible input, because earlier Tribunal decisions had already distinguished the Revenue's cited precedents and accepted printing ink in similar circumstances. The same view had also been applied on identical facts to ink used for printing brand and manufacturer names on bags. In the absence of any contrary authority from the Revenue, that earlier reasoning was followed and the input claim was accepted. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91733