<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 283 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91718</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was considered on a prima facie assessment of the demand and the applicants&#039; financial hardship. The identity of the manufacturer and undervaluation objections were treated as arguable, but the department&#039;s material on duty payment, absence of a price list, and statements suggesting clandestine movement and cash sales weighed against full waiver. The claim that tools, dies, and fixtures were exempt under Notification No. 177/86 also required detailed scrutiny, and the hardship plea was weakened by the lack of a rough balance sheet or other financial data. Substantial interim relief was granted, with a partial deposit ordered for one applicant and full waiver for the others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 283 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91718</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was considered on a prima facie assessment of the demand and the applicants&#039; financial hardship. The identity of the manufacturer and undervaluation objections were treated as arguable, but the department&#039;s material on duty payment, absence of a price list, and statements suggesting clandestine movement and cash sales weighed against full waiver. The claim that tools, dies, and fixtures were exempt under Notification No. 177/86 also required detailed scrutiny, and the hardship plea was weakened by the lack of a rough balance sheet or other financial data. Substantial interim relief was granted, with a partial deposit ordered for one applicant and full waiver for the others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>