<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 193 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91716</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was held admissible on additional customs duty paid on a machine re-imported after repair. The re-import exemption notification merely fixed a concessional assessable value by reference to repair charges, insurance and freight; it did not change the levy into duty paid only on repair-related charges. Because the additional customs duty was paid on the re-imported capital goods themselves, the reduced assessable value did not negate the character of the duty or justify denial of credit. The authorities&#039; view that no duty had been paid on the capital goods was unsustainable, and the denial of credit was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:29:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 193 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91716</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was held admissible on additional customs duty paid on a machine re-imported after repair. The re-import exemption notification merely fixed a concessional assessable value by reference to repair charges, insurance and freight; it did not change the levy into duty paid only on repair-related charges. Because the additional customs duty was paid on the re-imported capital goods themselves, the reduced assessable value did not negate the character of the duty or justify denial of credit. The authorities&#039; view that no duty had been paid on the capital goods was unsustainable, and the denial of credit was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>