https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91680 The Final Order in the case allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order. The Department's application for rectification of mistake was successful, leading to the reopening of the matter to address the aspect of clandestine removal of goods. Despite allegations of clandestine removal, the lack of proper investigation and corroborative evidence resulted in the conclusion that the demand for clandestine removal could not be substantiated. The Final Order confirmed the disposal of the matter in favor of the appellant. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:54:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91680 The Final Order in the case allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order. The Department's application for rectification of mistake was successful, leading to the reopening of the matter to address the aspect of clandestine removal of goods. Despite allegations of clandestine removal, the lack of proper investigation and corroborative evidence resulted in the conclusion that the demand for clandestine removal could not be substantiated. The Final Order confirmed the disposal of the matter in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91680