<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 320 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91674</link>
    <description>Excess freight collected over actual transport cost was held not to form part of the assessable value for central excise, because excise is a tax on manufacture and not on profit earned from transportation. The Department produced no evidence that the differential freight was anything other than transportation charges, so the amount was excluded from valuation and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:36:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 320 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91674</link>
      <description>Excess freight collected over actual transport cost was held not to form part of the assessable value for central excise, because excise is a tax on manufacture and not on profit earned from transportation. The Department produced no evidence that the differential freight was anything other than transportation charges, so the amount was excluded from valuation and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>