https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91658 A conditional remand for factual verification is valid where the appellate order clearly identifies the matters to be examined and is not vague merely because its effect depends on the result. The challenge was confined to alleged vagueness; there was no dispute on classification merits or the applicability of Note 6 to Chapter 32. The remand was understood as requiring verification of whether the goods received were formulated, standardised or prepared dyes and whether the process adopted fell within the CBEC clarification dated 21-4-1993. The objection to the appellate order was rejected, and the remand in favour of the respondents was sustained. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:25:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91658 A conditional remand for factual verification is valid where the appellate order clearly identifies the matters to be examined and is not vague merely because its effect depends on the result. The challenge was confined to alleged vagueness; there was no dispute on classification merits or the applicability of Note 6 to Chapter 32. The remand was understood as requiring verification of whether the goods received were formulated, standardised or prepared dyes and whether the process adopted fell within the CBEC clarification dated 21-4-1993. The objection to the appellate order was rejected, and the remand in favour of the respondents was sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91658