https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91656 A conditional remand directing verification of whether the goods received were formulated, standardised or prepared dyes, and whether the process used to make printing paste fell within the relevant departmental circular, was not vague merely because it required factual inquiry. The Tribunal held that the appellate authority's directions were sufficiently identifiable and within jurisdiction. Since the challenge was confined to alleged vagueness and did not assail the merits of classification or the applicability of Note 6 to Chapter 32, there was no basis to interfere. The remand was sustained and the Revenue's challenge failed. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:51:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91656 A conditional remand directing verification of whether the goods received were formulated, standardised or prepared dyes, and whether the process used to make printing paste fell within the relevant departmental circular, was not vague merely because it required factual inquiry. The Tribunal held that the appellate authority's directions were sufficiently identifiable and within jurisdiction. Since the challenge was confined to alleged vagueness and did not assail the merits of classification or the applicability of Note 6 to Chapter 32, there was no basis to interfere. The remand was sustained and the Revenue's challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91656