<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 378 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91655</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the rejection of a refund claim for differential duty on a second-hand printing machine. The Custom House adopted a higher value for duty assessment based on the price of a new machine with depreciation, leading to discrepancies. The Tribunal found ambiguity in the assessment process due to conflicting certificate values and lack of clarity in depreciation calculation. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the depreciation allowance was upheld, with the impugned order set aside, allowing the appeal due to the discrepancy in assessed versus declared value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:49:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 378 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91655</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the rejection of a refund claim for differential duty on a second-hand printing machine. The Custom House adopted a higher value for duty assessment based on the price of a new machine with depreciation, leading to discrepancies. The Tribunal found ambiguity in the assessment process due to conflicting certificate values and lack of clarity in depreciation calculation. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the depreciation allowance was upheld, with the impugned order set aside, allowing the appeal due to the discrepancy in assessed versus declared value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>