https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91649 A typographical reference to a penalty reduction from Rs. 3 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh in the concluding portion of an earlier final order did not affect the Tribunal's conscious decision, because the order already reflected that the original penalty was Rs. 6 lakhs and that it had deliberately been reduced to Rs. 1 lakh. The rectification application succeeded only on clerical record issues: the final order was directed to be amended to show disposal of both appeals, including Appeal No. C/280/97-A, and to bear the composite order number 178-178A/98-A. The substantive penalty reduction remained unchanged. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:22:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91649 A typographical reference to a penalty reduction from Rs. 3 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh in the concluding portion of an earlier final order did not affect the Tribunal's conscious decision, because the order already reflected that the original penalty was Rs. 6 lakhs and that it had deliberately been reduced to Rs. 1 lakh. The rectification application succeeded only on clerical record issues: the final order was directed to be amended to show disposal of both appeals, including Appeal No. C/280/97-A, and to bear the composite order number 178-178A/98-A. The substantive penalty reduction remained unchanged. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 17 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91649