<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91634</link>
    <description>An assessee&#039;s alternative claim for Modvat credit under Rule 57A could not be rejected merely because the original claim before the lower authorities had been made under Rule 57Q. On the available facts, the alternative statutory plea was held maintainable for consideration, and the proper course was remand to the original authority for fresh examination of that claim. The impugned order was set aside so that the Modvat credit issue under Rule 57A could be decided on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91634</link>
      <description>An assessee&#039;s alternative claim for Modvat credit under Rule 57A could not be rejected merely because the original claim before the lower authorities had been made under Rule 57Q. On the available facts, the alternative statutory plea was held maintainable for consideration, and the proper course was remand to the original authority for fresh examination of that claim. The impugned order was set aside so that the Modvat credit issue under Rule 57A could be decided on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>