<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 244 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91624</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs attributable to final products that later became exempt from duty had to be reversed under Rule 57C. The Tribunal treated the exemption status of the final product from the effective date of exemption as decisive, and held that credit already taken on inputs in stock or used for such exempted goods could not be retained even if availed before the exemption began. The appeal was rejected, and the demand for reversal of credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:53:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 244 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91624</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs attributable to final products that later became exempt from duty had to be reversed under Rule 57C. The Tribunal treated the exemption status of the final product from the effective date of exemption as decisive, and held that credit already taken on inputs in stock or used for such exempted goods could not be retained even if availed before the exemption began. The appeal was rejected, and the demand for reversal of credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>