<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of computer work station and peripherals under Heading 8471 and 8473.30, respectively, ruling they were not accessories to the spectrometer. Confiscation of goods and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962, for misdeclaration and unauthorized import were affirmed. The judgment sets a precedent for accurate goods classification under the Customs Tariff and the repercussions of misdeclaration and unauthorized imports under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:46:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of computer work station and peripherals under Heading 8471 and 8473.30, respectively, ruling they were not accessories to the spectrometer. Confiscation of goods and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962, for misdeclaration and unauthorized import were affirmed. The judgment sets a precedent for accurate goods classification under the Customs Tariff and the repercussions of misdeclaration and unauthorized imports under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>