<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 237 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91616</link>
    <description>The appellant, a Custom House Agent, faced allegations of transferring the license to an unauthorized person without proper notification, lack of due diligence in cargo inspection, unauthorized persons signing documents, and charging excess fees. The Tribunal found that while some charges were upheld, the evidence did not conclusively prove all allegations. The revocation of the license was deemed too severe, and the appellant&#039;s license was instead suspended for three years with conditions imposed. A separate judgment set aside the revocation order, considering the appellant&#039;s punishment endured and lack of direct involvement in the unauthorized actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:23:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 237 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91616</link>
      <description>The appellant, a Custom House Agent, faced allegations of transferring the license to an unauthorized person without proper notification, lack of due diligence in cargo inspection, unauthorized persons signing documents, and charging excess fees. The Tribunal found that while some charges were upheld, the evidence did not conclusively prove all allegations. The revocation of the license was deemed too severe, and the appellant&#039;s license was instead suspended for three years with conditions imposed. A separate judgment set aside the revocation order, considering the appellant&#039;s punishment endured and lack of direct involvement in the unauthorized actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>