https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91610 In a prima facie arguable classification dispute over self-adhesive laminated goods, the Tribunal indicated that Heading 39.10 appeared more appropriate than Heading 39.20, but it did not finally decide classification at this stage. On the stay issue, it granted conditional waiver of pre-deposit on deposit of a specified amount and stayed recovery of the balance pending disposal of the appeal. The limitation point under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was mentioned in argument, but no final ruling was given. en-us Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:03:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91610 In a prima facie arguable classification dispute over self-adhesive laminated goods, the Tribunal indicated that Heading 39.10 appeared more appropriate than Heading 39.20, but it did not finally decide classification at this stage. On the stay issue, it granted conditional waiver of pre-deposit on deposit of a specified amount and stayed recovery of the balance pending disposal of the appeal. The limitation point under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was mentioned in argument, but no final ruling was given. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91610