<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 364 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that interest on advances should not be included in the assessable value unless there is clear evidence of a reduction in price directly attributable to the advances. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete proof of the influence of advances on pricing decisions to justify their inclusion in the assessable value of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:42:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 364 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that interest on advances should not be included in the assessable value unless there is clear evidence of a reduction in price directly attributable to the advances. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete proof of the influence of advances on pricing decisions to justify their inclusion in the assessable value of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>